Monthly Archive for October, 2009

Give the BNP a stage. The public trap-door is ready.

Lech Sikorski

The BNP have been accused of committing the worst forms of quasi-intellectualism, narrow-minded racism, tactical yoking and shameful incidents of conduct – race exclusive membership – to have pervaded Britain’s shores in recent times. There appears to be a consensus amongst political commentators that the BNP is deliberatively malicious towards ethnic minorities, in their attempts to ‘cleanse’ Britain of multi-culturalist attitudes under the banners of “real British identity” and “sustainable demographics.” Whilst there is an agreement about the controversial nature of the BNP, there is a disagreement about how best to confront it’s recent popularity.

The recent decision to allow the BNP on Question Time has brought fury to those who claim that we shouldn’t give the BNP a national platform. Personally, I believe that maximum exposure of the BNP would assist in the process of dragging their muck politics out of the gutter and being held to account by the court of public opinion. Bonnie Greer, Jack Straw, Chris Huhne and as of yet unknown representative of the Conservative party have the opportunity to deftly discredit the BNP brand and should seize it as a responsibility to do so. The arguments that the BNP propose must be proved to the people, like any political party in a democratic system, to be demonstratively wrong, illogical and unworkable. An appearance of Question Time will help to speed up the de-masking process.

Should the appearance of BNP leader Nick Griffin on Question Time be allowed to happen? Is this a failing of current party politics? The Politics Society welcomes and encourages all views. Tell us what you think.

Conservative Party Conference Extra- Road to the Manifesto

October 6th 2009

By: Graham Wilderoder

This morning a question and answer session was hosted by Oliver Letwin, (Chairman of the Policy Review and of the Conservative Research Department) and Francis Maude (Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office and Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster) in Manchester Town Hall. In this session, light was shed on the Conservative Party’s future manifesto plans for the forthcoming General Election.

Here is a quick overview of some answers given to audience members:

Law and Order:

The issues of tackling binge drinking in this country and ‘breaking the drugs culture’ were seen as being important in reducing the causes of crime. They intend to tackle alcohol related issues by giving local authorities more power in the remit of licensing and also by being tougher on supermarket practices. Whilst breaking the drugs culture would involve the rehabilitation of former drug-addicted prisoners, in order to reduce the 70% of them re-offending and going back to prison within two years. This would be done through paying voluntary sector and social organisations to assist with rehabilitation, reducing the long-term social and economic costs to society. In another answer, criticism was also levelled at the “bureaucratic micromanagement,” and the top-down career structure (from the Home Secretary downwards), in the police force. Instead, a move to a more community-orientated police force was proposed, partly through the creation of a serious crime map website, which would allow residents to see the crime statistics in their neighbourhood. Finally, another future aim is to have a police force making decisions as close to the frontline as possible.

Education:

The Conservatives do not want to dramatically alter the exam system. Instead one policy proposed would be to introduce ‘technical schools.’ They would like these to give students vocational diplomas and key GCSEs. Allowing them to compete with other schools and increasing standards across the board as a result.

Whilst in universities, they want to increase the places available during the recession, to raise the number of skilled workers for afterwards. This would be achieved by creating an incentive for some students to pay their loans back early, putting more money back into the system. On the issue of student debt, the present loan system looks like it will remain in place if they were to come into power. As for contact hours, it would be student feedback of universities that could pressure change.

Long Term Goals:

In ten years from now, if they were hypothetically still in power, they hope to have solved the “deficit crisis,” by balancing the books, and the “job crisis,” by not wasting the job opportunities of a generation. Fundamental reforms of public services was mentioned, with the aim of it being more transparent and decentralised. Deregulation of businesses among other points was also raised. They emphasised the long term nature of their goals, and the time required to address some of their above ambitions could take longer than the five years.

Mention was also given in another answer, to starting the planning of a high-speed railway after a possible victory, regardless of the economic crisis. They hope this will have cultural and economic benefits for the UK.

Foreign Policy

With aid they wish to increase transparency in the ‘chain,’ work closely with donor states and civil societies, with weight being put on how the money is spent. In Afghanistan, they hope to ‘re-orientate’ policy, with a more ‘overall development approach’ and creating a stronger, peaceful society. They also emphasised that they were not ‘neo-conservative,’ and reject the idea of imposing social structures on Afghan society.